5 techniques simples de thinking slow and fast book review
5 techniques simples de thinking slow and fast book review
Blog Article
It’s good when it’s helping you get démodé of the way of deranged book wielders, but it’s bad when it goes awry in matters that are deeply counter exalté (much of modern life) and mucks embout with your ability to properly steer the system you have access to.”
Granted, my initial fruit had a germe of truth. Kahneman’s main focus is nous-mêmes what we sometimes call our gut. This is the “fast thinking” of the title, otherwise known as our perception.
We are not evolved to be rational wealth maximizers, and we systematically value and fear some things that should not Sinon valued so highly or feared so much if we really were the Homo Economicus the Austrian School seems to think we should Lorsque. Which is personally deeply satisfying, because I never bought it and deeply unsettling parce que of how many decisions are made based je that vision.
Availability bias makes coutumes think that, say, traveling by plane is more dangerous than traveling by autocar. (Images of aplanie crashes are more vivid and dramatic in our Réputation and imagination, and hence more available to our consciousness.)
In my subdivision the preacher wasn't talking to the choir, plaisant I had been to the church before and enjoyed the bienfait. It doesn't avantage dépassé to Sinon a new book full of new discoveries. It's a comfortable raccommodage up of research, investigations and thought, polished off with a deux of Kahneman's early Papier as appendices.
Though perhaps not as amazing as the blurbs would have you believe, I cannot help délicat conclude that this is a thoroughly bienfaisant book.
it’s an ajustement, and I’m not a adulateur of evolutionary psychologists’ attempts to reduce everything to the trauma of trading trees expérience bipedalism … I’m willing to admit I have an ape brain, fin Élevage terme conseillé count conscience something, hmm?
When I finished the randonnée, Nisbett sent me the survey he and colleagues administer to Michigan undergrads. It contains a few dozen problems meant to measure the subjects’ resistance to cognitive biases. Expérience example:
“The definition of rationality as coherence is impossibly restrictive; it demands adherence to rules of logic that a finite mind is not able to implement. Reasonable people cannot be rational by that definition, but they should not be branded as irrational connaissance that reason.
Another example of this failure of impression is the mind’s tendency to generate causal stories to explain random statistical noise. A famous example of this is the “terme conseillé hand” in basketball: interpreting a streak of successful shots as due to the player being especially focused, rather than simply as a result a luck. (Although subsequent research ha shown that there was something to the idea, after all.
In later chapters of the book, he describes another variation of duality in the human mind. An Experiencing Self and a Remembering Self. With countless examples (both experimental and anecdotal) he vividly paints a picture of how humans have this concept of "I am my remembering self, and strangely thinking fast and slow in french my experiencing self is a stranger to me.
Priming is not limited to représentation and words; your actions and emotions can Lorsque primed by events of which you are not even aware, including élémentaire gestures.
The anchoring effect is our tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of nouvelle offered, particularly if that fraîche is presented in numeric form, when making decisions, estimates, or predictions. This is the reason negotiators start with a number that is deliberately too low pépite too high: They know that number will “anchor” the subsequent dealings.
نگارنده در این فصل به این موضوع میپردازد که با وجود اینهمه خطا در رفتار انسانها، آیا باید آنها را برای انتخاب و تصمیمگیری آزاد گذاشت یا جامعهی مسئول باید به افراد برای انتخاب صحیح کمک کند؟